I am a hundred pages through Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, about an eighth away before finishing this 800+ page novel. I anticipate every word written and love the secret wisdom Tolstoy hides in each chapter. Somewhere in this book, a line appealed to me regarding Platonic relationships.
" In such love there can be no tragedy....because in that love all is clear and pure..." -Tolstoy
Platonic love, "in its modern popular sense, is a non-sexual, affectionate relationship" (wikipedia). I have always considered a friendship I have with one of my best-guyfriend to be platonic. We labelled it so, strictly friends practically brother-sisterly. Not because we chose it to be that way, but because it became so. We clicked and connected that way. It is quite hilarious that many of our mutual friends considered us a couple back in high school, and we'd both be fairly annoyed and intimidated, complaining at society's ridiculous standards. Very heteronormative, and what I'd often call narrow-minded or shallow.
There definitely is something different about this friendship. The different insights and perspective we both have to offer in each other. Similar to a romantic relationship, yet at the same time slightly different. It is relentless that while I 'think-like-a-girl' and he 'thinks-like-a-guy', there's some sort of value in each other's opinions. Yet, emotions seem to be a lot more sensitive in a romantic relationship than platonic ones, I think. I mean, when you regard a guy as your brother, you couldn't care less about 'emotion-factor'. If the guy is your boyfriend, you'd probably want him to appeal to your emotions and vice versa.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in the importance of both types of relationships. There are advantages and similarities in both kinds.
One thing I'd often come across in seeking advice from a friend who is a girl, is the possibility of girls being slightly more judgmental than guys. I find myself putting on some sort of internal defense mechanism when confiding with a girl. But with my 'platonic-buddy', I couldn't care less what he thinks....maybe because most of the time, he doesn't tell me what I 'should' do, but rather 'what-would've-happened-had-you-done-otherwise'. It is a slightly more positive approach to prove my wrong, I guess.
Two days ago, my platonic buddy and I arranged a double date which I thought to be the most interesting night of my life. First of all, I felt so grown up! Such a transition from our high school-life-friendship, really. It was all sweet, and matured, something practically out of the movie. There is something I continue to treasure about this friendship we have, and that is despite absence, distance and time, there is no denying that such friendship existed. Above all, there is no coercion to artificially force such friendship to occur.
I am confident to say that the clarity in ideals shared in a platonic relationship and purity in motives, is what prevents the tragedy which Tolstoy speaks of.